| |
| Author |
Message |
w1ldcathockey1
Minors
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 112
Location: Cleveland, OH
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 4:33 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Well hey hey I still vote Leclaire but I mean c mon Leclaire has help also remember... Norrenna and also Osgood has played more games than Leclaire, keep that in mind.
MY VOTE IS STILL LECLAIRE =D |
|
|
|
AnArtfulTender
Minors
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 128
Location: Charleston, Illinois, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
but anyway...how did this post turn into leclaire vs. osgood? aside from the title of the thread...bah nevermind.
_________________
ATHLETES FOR THE ECONOMY OF MOVEMENT (AEM) |
|
|
|
vector34
Peewee
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 8
Location: durand mi
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I would have to go with osgood. I am not saying leclaire is not good but he has a hard time staying healtjy. detroit may not give up as many shots but the quality of shots is another story. They tend to give up breakaways and 3 on 2 chances. |
|
|
|
Cooper 35
Minors
Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Posts: 187
Location: San Jose State
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
when leclaire is healthy, he is better, then again, if he played on detroit, he wouldnt see enough shots to get injured...
_________________
 |
|
|
|
vector34
Peewee
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 8
Location: durand mi
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| He still has not proven he can play a full yearwithout being injured. With future hall of famer hasek got pulled osgood came in to post a 14 hot 5 ok and 0 bad games while leclaire cant play a full year. Have you ever watched detroit they give up better quality chances compared to bs shots they barely get to the net. So far he is unproven. |
|
|
|
Jesusprice
College
Joined: 03 Oct 2008
Posts: 40
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Laclaire > Osgood |
|
|
|
|
